LEARN FROM OTHERS
8/23/06
- CA Attorney General Report - Gambling
in the Golden State, May 2006 - Excerpts
from news article: The report by the attorney general's office concludes
"the annual cost of adult pathological gamblers in California
is an estimated $489 million and the annual cost of adult problem
gamblers is an estimated $509 million."
"These
costs derive from a number of social and personal problems that correlate
with problem gambling, including crime, unpaid debts and bankruptcy,
mental illness, substance abuse, unemployment and public assistance,"
it says.
In addition,
crime rates are higher near gambling establishments, and problem gamblers
are more likely to commit violent crimes. An alarming number of problem
gamblers, nearly half, are youths. (Legislators
press ahead, 8/2/3/06) Report: http://www.library.ca.gov/crb/06/04/06-004.pdf
Casinos
and Sovereignty - In some states, only Indian tribes are
allowed to own casinos. For those states, the issue of sovereignty
is a major consideration. A presentation before the American Bar Association
in March 2005 outlines the legal cases which refute the inflated claims
of "sovereignty" used by many casino tribes when trying
to gain competitive advantages over other local businesses. "As
Indian enterprises like casinos grow and enter interestate commerce
in ways indistinguishable from non-Indian competitors, Federal laws,
including labor and employment laws, will be asserted." "Indian
tribes have some attributes of sovereignty, but these are frequently
misunderstood and overstated." "These cases manifest the
recognition that as Indian tribes increasingly engage in business
activities in commerce with people and business organizations from
outside their reservations, there is no sound reason to treat them
differently than non-Indian businesses." The National Labor Relations
Board "explicityly rejected the contention that Indian-owned
enterprises are 'government' operations and therefore exempt."
(San Manuel
Indian Bingo and Casino, Richard G. McCracken, 2005)
Study:
Casino and hotel impact on town of 1,050 people could be $13.4 million.
A nine-month study of a casino's potential impacts on Plymouth's infrastructure
came to a rough end number last Thursday when a consultant said the
toll on the city of 1,050 people could run as high as $13.4 million.
(12/14/05)
Gambling
and Crime
among Arrestees: Exploring the Link Is there a connection
between problem gambling and crime? Do compulsive or pathological gamblers
resort to criminal activity to pay their debts and finance their bets?
Using the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program as a survey
vehicle, researchers found significantly more problem gambling among
arrestees than in the general population. The arrestees who were interviewed
had high levels of criminal activity related to pathological gambling.
The percentage of problem or pathological gamblers among the arrestees
was three to five times higher than in the general population. Nearly
one-third of arrestees identified as pathological gamblers admitted
having committed robbery in the previous year. Approximately 13 percent
had assaulted someone for money. Pathological gamblers were much more
likely to have sold drugs than other arrestees. U.S. Deptartment
of Justice, 2004. ; Pathological
Gambling in Arrestee Populations, Richard C. McCorkle, Ph.D., 2002
(National Criminal Justice Reference
Service, US Dept. of Justice)
All
Gambling All the Time-
Turning the Empire State into the Gambling State
"This report has revealed the dark side of gambling: the "silent"
addiction of problem gambling; political corruption; crime; suicide;
and hidden economic costs. This is the side that the gambling interests
don't want anyone to see. Theirs is the lie that soft-pedals gambling
as "gaming"; it is the false promise of economic salvation;
and it is the glib dismissal of people who are suffering as a direct
consequence of state action." A
Legislative Report by Senator Frank Padavan, April, 2004
Newsbrief:
Construction Law "A casino project on Indian Land
is different form (and more risky than) other tpes of public and private
projects because, all other things being equal, a contractor generally
has fewer rem4edies to collect payment on an Indian casino project.
There are two primary reasons for this lack of meaningful remedies.
First, federally recognized Indian Tribes are generally immune from
lawsuits in both federal and state courts for civil matters. Second,
the land upon which the project is built may be owned in such a manner
that a contractor may not be able to successfully enforce a lien upon
it." (3/5/04)
Impact
of Casino Gambling on Bankruptcy Rates: A County Level Analysis
Results from applying regression analysis to U.S. bankruptcy data for
1990 and 1999 indicate that counties that legalized casinos during the
period suffered individual bankruptcy rates more than 100 percent higher
than counties that remained casino-less. (03/12/04)
Gambling
Expansion Big Loser in 2003
The truth was, and is, that gambling contains the seeds of its own destruction.
States, like individuals, cannot gamble themselves rich. But they can,
and have, gambled themselves poor, as demonstrated by Nevada's $870
million budget deficit in 2003. (01/10/04)
Problem
Gambling
One of four people whose gambling included VLTs were at-risk or problem
gamblers, confirming the much-reported notion that VLTs are the "crack
cocaine" of gambling. Those who bought only lottery tickets had
the lowest chance of becoming problem gamblers. (12/12/03)
Impact
of IGRA on Gambling in the U.S. -
Because the casino and associated facilities are located on tribal trust
land, which is exempt from state and local regulation and taxation,
communities cannot control caisno development and its impacts, or rely
upon taxation to raise revenue to cover the cost of any response to
impacts. The result is a potential worst-case scenario for local governments
- unrestricted growth that occurs beyond regulatory control, but has
massive impacts on the very fabric of the community. International Municipal
Lawyers' Association (10/13/03)
Tribal
Casinos - and their impacts on a California Community
Tribal casinos impact state and local public services-increasing the
costs and potentially lowering the quality of service. Negative impacts
include greater law enforcement and fire protection needs, traffic mitigation
and road maintenance, water and sewage extension and maintenance, augmented
social services (including family health care and affordable housing),
open space conservation and the added cost to infrastructure extension.
(2003)
NPR Interview with Time Magazine Reporters Barlett and Steele
So the picture that you're painting is that some of the casinos are
run by tribes that are almost tribes in name only because they represent
so few people, and that the profits go to very few people. Instead of
benefiting a large number of Native Americans, they go to this very
small tribe and they go to the backers and the investors of this casino.
(12/16/02)
Special Report - Indian Casinos
Look Who's Cashing In At Indian Casinos - Hint: It's not the people
who are supposed to benefit. Donald L. Barlett and James B. Steele,
Time Magazine (12/00/02)
Economic
Impact of Legalizing Gambling
Gambling enterprises have a tremendous economic impact on surrounding
regions and states. Glenn O. Thompson (1/4/02)
Casinos
More Often Lead to Losses than to Economic Development
Although many officials have promoted casinos as a means
to support lasting economic development, Earl Grinols of the University
of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and David Mustard of the University
of Georgia concluded the opposite. They found that the costs outstripped
the gains almost twofoldan imbalance that amounts to a national
loss of at least $27.5 billion each year. Scientific American (10/03/01)
National
Gambling Impact Study Commission - Final Report (6/18/99)
When
Gambling Comes to Town
The bottom line. In general, gambling needs to be covered like other
economic development proposals -- glitz and hype notwithstanding. Journalists
should not forget that they may be the only ones able to cast a skeptical
eye on plans to expand legalized gambling in their community. Columbia
Journalism Review - (January/February 1994)